The Ontological Argument for Gods existence Essay

The Ontological Argument for Gods existence - Essay ExampleArguments for the existence of God atomic number 18 establish on revelations of the Realized Souls. At their level everything is perfect, ever the same, and without any confusedness or contradiction. All confusion and arguments arise, when mind-level intellectuals begin to interpret the revelations of the transcendental Arguments for the existence of God ground on general revelation are also called natural theology.Next to general revelations, is the special revelation and this is the area where the problems for the humanity begin cod to their wrong understanding/interpretation. Those issues are who God is, what God has done and will do and how He expects us to live. Such divine instructions are found in The Bible, Quran, Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, Vedas, etc. Natural theology based on reasoning is incapable of demonstrating Gods existence. Relying on ones own legal opinion and reasoning skills to reach God is full of pit falls. Human beings are likely to confuse the terminal points of their thoughts as the limitation of God. Arguments for the existence of God based on the appearance of design in the world again embodiment part of the domain of reasoning and inductive logic. Design arguments are also known as teleological arguments. The perfect army in the universe is offered as the perfect reason for the existence of God. The perfect order seen in the universe can non be a matter of chance. If the watch of necessity the watch maker, the universe needs the universe-maker, so say the Creationists. The universe must be the product of intelligent design, they believe. Objections to the design arguments say that it is not necessary to depend upon a God-hypothesis to explain the orderly positioning of the things in the world. Science is capable of explaining everything, fit in to such votaries. They argue that life is created from the Big-bang, and one sees the natural evolutionary process in the thin gs around. But these flock