It Is Difficult to Remain a Bystander in the Face of Conflict. Discuss. Essay

It is nasty to re important a bystander in the face of remainder. discuss.In any give-and- have of passage of arms it is important to consider the many types of employment that can be experienced and the likelihood of pillowing aloof from the ideological, emotional, somatogenetic, moral and spiritual dimensions of date. impinge in general can be found in both of valet de chambre history and in its reflection in art, poetry, belles-lettres and in the everyday experience of homophileity. Moral dilemmas, property and border disputes, love lifers spats, sibling rivalry, gloomy hearts, jealousy, envy and lust for power. The list is long, many great deal have want to point out a way to detain neutral only are inevitably raddled into conflict compelled by conscience, desire or belief, or are swept up in conflict as conscionable collateral damage. By definition a bystander is a psyche toast at an event or incident but does not defy part. Conflict can show its face in many forms. precisely its not the nature of the conflict that can draw state from the sidelines it can be the power the person is set about with and completely reliant on the belief they herstwhile(a) and their moral constitution. A common objective life example is when you pass a mugging in progress. Youre faced with a dilemma, to either help the stranger and risk physical harm to yourself or leave the stranger to his fate and remain unhurt yourself.It is not the situation of conflict that pulls onlookers into the fray, but the strength of an individuals will that plays the main role in whether one bends a martyr for a answer or cowers. Galileo is faced with a similar situation where he is roiling by a spiritual and strong moral conflict where he must choose between science or faith. It was difficult for Galileo to remain a bystander, the inquisitive nature and the constant drive to seek the true statement of how the celestial satellites behave given to him by Bertolt Brecht. Brecht used Galileo as a tool to illustrate that a man with passion can find it difficult to remain a bystander in the face of conflict disquieted is the land where heroes are needed Galileo saw himself as that hero, plagued with the assign of educating Italy and the world. This task he bestowed upon himself resulted in oft dispute between the churchs teachings and Europe. Galileo is also sh aver as only human being a man of trope and blood that enjoys the pleasures of life but when faced with the threat of physical torment he quails. He It may be true that a person with passion may be easily stirred to rise to the argufy of a spiritual or moral debate but conflicts of a physical nature, such as open conflict or a battle between ideological beliefs allows little choice to the surrounding bystanders to remain uninvolved sooner or laterone must take sides. If one is to remain human in Vietnam war many people took sides but just as many were ignorant and unwilling to co ntact in the violence and ideological conflict that was raging throughout southeastern United States Asia.As the red wave of communism swept south-west endangering the old colonial powers. It was as if a hornets nest was struck. War pulls people, unwillingly towards it, to feed itself and to grow. The peasants were hit the hardest in the Vietnam war. You and your like are trying to subscribe a war with the help of people who just arent interested. They put one acrosst want communism. They want enough sieve, They dont want to be shot at. They want one day to be much the same as another. The peasants were used as pawns, seen as cheap human shields and laborers. The communists used villages to hide its no useAfter every attack the Vietcong hide their weapon and disguise themselves as farmers using them for their own protection and gain. Equally the French and the communist used them to harvest the rice fields. For in war, food is more valuable than gold. For the peasants they had l ittle discernment of the battles that raged around them but their ignorance did not protect them from stray bullets or daub explosions. The quiet American explores a wide range of conflicts from the physical land of open conflict to the ideological. Graham Greene through the polar opposite characters of mountain and Fowler illustrates that remaining uninvolved and untouched by these two forms of conflict is impossible. by means of the large difference between the two characters we can see that in that location is no specific type of person that becomes engage when conflict arises but it is human nature to become involved. Fowler with age and experience, made bitter by the world and human nature and proudly unbiased in his views towards the conflict around him and Pile with youth, inexperience and a gentle simplicity of human nature.The stark contrast is a metaphor of how anyone can be drawn into conflict, even without noticing in Fowlers case. Fowler was shocked into action by Piles wide-eyed mined motives of the bombing and the simplicity in which he saw it. purity is a kind of insanity and Piles insanity caused many to become involved. The matter in which one stays detached from internal conflict such as matters oflove is much more complicated. History and literature is ripe with stories of, kingdoms falling, Machiavellian politicians and heroes prevailing in the name of love. The human race is obsessed with the idea of love, whether it be love for ones country, for ones friends or ones wife or husband. It is difficult to remain aloof from the desire and the calling we all on the QT crave. Phuong is an interesting case. She managed to remain relatively independent from the two men who were battle for her hand. This might be due to the cultural differences in the belief of love and duty of a woman, she doesnt love like you or I compared to the mindset of a western woman. Greene uses Phuong as a metaphor for Vietnam. A silent, fragile thing with Fowl er representing the old Colonial powers such as France and England bandage Pile representing the new age of America. Both fighting for supremacy over her. It may be true that remaining a bystander when one is confronted with conflict is challenging but it is not the conflict itself that is to blame.It is difficult to remain a bystander in the face of conflict, but not for every situation. Each situation of conflict has a host of factors at play such as the type of conflict as well at the person affronted. Whether it is by choice or involuntarily our world and society is based upon conflict and how we deal with it.It may be safe to remain a bystander when faced with conflict.